Recertification that leaves you
certifiable
I'm a GP (Toronto, class of '82)
who's been practising family medicine with obstetrics,
and now emergency, for the past 20 years. I also teach
family practice residents (you'll understand the irony
of this later) at our local hospital in Orangeville,
ON.
I've always been very conscientious
about CME. In 2002, I decided to obtain my CCFP, in
order to broaden my future salaried job opportunities
when the time comes to slow down. I was required to
take an online course in evidence-based medicine, which
cost me $900; the course was excellent and I passed.
I then took the CCFP exams. I passed the written portion,
but unfortunately I didn't pass the oral exams, which
were made up solely of patient encounters � interviews
but no physical examinations.
I was told that I didn't follow
the precepts of "family centred patient care," and that
I was "too directive" in my patient encounters. This
came as a surprise since after 20 years in practice,
with too many patients in my care, I consider myself
an expert in determining what the patient needs from
me (diagnosis, relief from symptoms, reassurance or
a note for work) and providing it within a minimum time
period.
A literature search on Medline
for "family centred patient care" brought up six pages
of nursing, social work, psychology, etc, journal references.
As far as I can gather, it's a nursing philosophy adopted
by the Ontario College of Family Physicians (and other
colleges, I assume) and taught only to family practice
residents. This is undoubtedly part of the College's
efforts to identify family medicine as a specialized
'discipline.' Courses in family centred patient care
for doctors aren't offered by the College, and the education
director didn't know (or care) how I might obtain training
in this 'discipline.'
I suspect the real reason they
don't make a course in family centred patient care mandatory
is that it would ruin their failure rate. I also suspect
that the large majority of failures are confined to
people who, like me, will still be able to practise
medicine without their CCFP. In other words, I feel
I was set up as a political scapegoat.
As a result, I no longer trust
the College of Family Physicians to decide on my competence.
I think it's time for a church-and-state style separation
for recertifying bodies and colleges, with adherence
to the following principles: 1) the authority responsible
for the recertification must have no other function;
2) the authority must be independent from all other
bodies of authority; 3) the body of knowledge required
to recertify must be determined by the group being recertified;
4) that body of knowledge must be updated every year,
on the basis of accepted practice and evidence-based
medicine; 5) there must be no other use for the recertification.
� Dr Barbara Watts, Orangeville,
ON
Note: A version of Dr Watts'
statement was also sent to the Ontario College of Family
Physicians and the College of Physicians and Surgeons
of Ontario, Quality Assurance Committee.
|