OCTOBER 15, 2004
VOLUME 1 NO. 19
 

 

Recertification that leaves you certifiable

I'm a GP (Toronto, class of '82) who's been practising family medicine with obstetrics, and now emergency, for the past 20 years. I also teach family practice residents (you'll understand the irony of this later) at our local hospital in Orangeville, ON.

I've always been very conscientious about CME. In 2002, I decided to obtain my CCFP, in order to broaden my future salaried job opportunities when the time comes to slow down. I was required to take an online course in evidence-based medicine, which cost me $900; the course was excellent and I passed. I then took the CCFP exams. I passed the written portion, but unfortunately I didn't pass the oral exams, which were made up solely of patient encounters � interviews but no physical examinations.

I was told that I didn't follow the precepts of "family centred patient care," and that I was "too directive" in my patient encounters. This came as a surprise since after 20 years in practice, with too many patients in my care, I consider myself an expert in determining what the patient needs from me (diagnosis, relief from symptoms, reassurance or a note for work) and providing it within a minimum time period.

A literature search on Medline for "family centred patient care" brought up six pages of nursing, social work, psychology, etc, journal references. As far as I can gather, it's a nursing philosophy adopted by the Ontario College of Family Physicians (and other colleges, I assume) and taught only to family practice residents. This is undoubtedly part of the College's efforts to identify family medicine as a specialized 'discipline.' Courses in family centred patient care for doctors aren't offered by the College, and the education director didn't know (or care) how I might obtain training in this 'discipline.'

I suspect the real reason they don't make a course in family centred patient care mandatory is that it would ruin their failure rate. I also suspect that the large majority of failures are confined to people who, like me, will still be able to practise medicine without their CCFP. In other words, I feel I was set up as a political scapegoat.

As a result, I no longer trust the College of Family Physicians to decide on my competence. I think it's time for a church-and-state style separation for recertifying bodies and colleges, with adherence to the following principles: 1) the authority responsible for the recertification must have no other function; 2) the authority must be independent from all other bodies of authority; 3) the body of knowledge required to recertify must be determined by the group being recertified; 4) that body of knowledge must be updated every year, on the basis of accepted practice and evidence-based medicine; 5) there must be no other use for the recertification.

� Dr Barbara Watts, Orangeville, ON

Note: A version of Dr Watts' statement was also sent to the Ontario College of Family Physicians and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Quality Assurance Committee.

 

 

back to top of page

 

 

 

 
 
© Parkhurst Publishing Privacy Statement
Legal Terms of Use
Site created by Spin Design T.